Consider this reaction: Just as casual sex is not necessarily inherently harmful, neither are online affairs.
But they may be so when participants are also involved in another primary offline relationship, because of the harm imposed on those partners.
Chatting is not cheating provided the guy only CHAT not cheating.
If you're flirting, sending naked pictures, and kisses etc, that's not call chatting. Cheating can be out drinking, lunch, coffee, dinner, bar, or even straight to the point "sxx" Well, for me, if my bf ever do that, and i will give him a chance, but how long can the women/lady tolerate.. Hello world, I am 30 yrs old and recently out of a relationship.
Nevertheless, since online affairs are real they do often cause actual harm to one's primary, offline romantic relationship.
In other words, a way to play out fantasies in a safe environment.
Online sexual activity can involve various activities, such as viewing explicitly sexual materials, participating in an exchange of ideas about sex, exchanging sexual messages, and online interactions with at least one other person with the intention of becoming sexually aroused.
In his stimulating paper, "Chatting Is Not Cheating," John Portmann defends online lust and characterizes about sex; he maintains that such talking is more similar to flirting than to having a sexual affair.
Accordingly, cybersex is about sex, but a form of sexual encounter involves experiences typical of other encounters, such as sexual arousal, masturbation, orgasm, and satisfaction.
Indeed, people consider cybersex to have a high degree of psychological reality—but many do not consider it to be consider it to be infidelity.